France’s Cetim one of first to adopt Desktop Metal Shop System

New collaboration to accelerate adoption of industrial metal AM

Desktop Metal has announced a new collaboration with Cetim, the France-based Technical Centre for Mechanical Industry. The partners will work together to promote and accelerate the global adoption of metal additive manufacturing across industrial sectors by identifying market opportunities for AM and supporting innovation across Cetim’s customer network. As part of the partnership, Cetim has already become, in last August, one of the first adopters of Desktop Metal’s new Shop System metal binder jetting platform.

Cetim was inspired to work with Desktop Metal after successfully installing and utilizing the Studio System at its facility in Cluses, France. The center will continue to leverage this system for rapid prototyping and low-volume production while has also added the Desktop Metal Shop System’s capability for low-volume prototyping or mid-volume runs of complex metal components. These resources will enable Cetim customers from across the aerospace, oil and gas and automotive sectors, to name a few, to explore new AM applications and opportunities.

“As the demand for metal AM continues to grow, it is challenging for many of the mechanical industry companies we work with to identify the right solution that meets their needs and then to implement it in an effective and cost efficient way,” explained Pierre Chalandon, COO at Cetim. “Desktop Metal technologies with both the Studio System and new Shop System completes our additive manufacturing machines park. From a general point of view, Metal Binder Jetting Technology is promising for a large part of our clients. Desktop Metal solutions portfolio covers the full metal product lifecycle, which is complementary to our experience on sintered material and finishing operations.”

The fine detail of a part 3D printed using the Shop System

The Desktop Metal Shop System, unveiled at Formnext 2019, is a metal binder jetting technology designed specifically for machine shop use and is capable of producing complex metal components with both speed and quality. The solution is also notable for its relative affordability: the Shop System starts at $150,000. Desktop Metal says the system is designed to enable shop manufacturers to “tap into new opportunities to reduce their costs and increase revenue.”

Through the partnership, Desktop Metal and Cetim will also work on a range of research projects involving Desktop Metal’s metal AM technologies, including design for metal AM processes, post-processing and finishing technique qualification, workflow optimization and materials development. Cetim brings to the table its extensive knowledge of metal AM processes (including LPBF, WAAM, MBJ), which it has built up over the past 15 years. In recent years, Cetim has been particularly involved in the development of metal binder jetting, which it believes creates new opportunities for production capacity and material range. The French center is also actively involved in the normalization of metal AM, coordinating the Additive Factory Hub (AFH) with the aim of implementing AM to address industrial and economic challenges.

“When it comes to empowering industrial companies with the additive manufacturing technologies of the future, Cetim is truly one of the leaders in Europe,” concluded Ric Fulop, CEO and Co-Founder of Desktop Metal. “We are excited to partner with Cetim as one of the first customers for our ground-breaking Shop System and are eager to collaborate with Cetim on our shared efforts to change the way that companies manufacture around the globe.”

Please do read the official article by Tess Boissonneault here.

Read More

EnvisionTEC lanches D4K Pro Dental

The highest resolution desktop DLP 3D printer for the dental segment

EnvisionTEC is introducing the new D4K Pro Dental, the highest resolution 4K desktop 3D printer specifically for the dental segment. The D4K Pro from EnvisionTEC includes the fastest print speed for a standard DLP printer (intended as non-continuous). As such it can deliver extremely accurate parts with the finest detail available.

The D4K Pro is built on an industrial 4K DLP projector which ensures stable performance for many years. The D4K Pro is compatible with all EnvisionTEC DLP resins for the dental industry, providing essential solutions for applications from models to full dentures and everything in between.

Designed for chairside and small labs, the D4K Pro is the industry’s newest solution, brought to you by the original inventors of DLP 3D printing technology. EnvisionTEC has been leading the way for dental 3D printing since 2003, with equipment and material innovations that have revolutionized the dental and orthodontic industries.

The company founded by Al Siblani has been serving the dental market since 2008, when Jim Glidewell walked up to an EnvisionTEC trade show booth and asked: “Can you do teeth?”

Glidwell is the owner of Glidewell Laboratories in Newport Beach, CA, one the single largest dental labs in the US. Today, Glidewell 3D prints dental prosthetics on nearly a dozen EnvisionTEC printers, both desktop and production models. “Our Perfactory 3D printer from EnvisionTEC allows us to create highly precise wax patterns at a fraction of the time required for a hand wax-up,” Glidwell said.

And EnvisionTEC offers an industry-leading dental materials portfolio that includes several FDA- and CE-approved materials for long term use in the mouth. These include NextDent C&B MFH, NextDent Denture 3D+, E-Guard, E-Guide Tint, and E-IDB, with more added regularly. These dental materials 3D print a full range of models (dental and orthodontic), castables (crowns, bridges, partial frameworks), restorations (crown, bridge, full roundhouse, as well as complete dentures) and appliances (surgical guides, bite splints, indirect bonding trays).

Please do read the official article by Davide Sher here.

Read More

Desktop Metal’s Live Sinter: How simulation software is mitigating sintering distortion

Sintering distortion is a fact of life in the Metal Injection Moulding industry. However, through the combination of an experienced eye, the ‘trial and error’ iteration of a part’s design, and the use of sintering supports when needed, stable high-volume production is achieved. With the growth of processes such as metal Binder Jetting, however, the need to manufacture a much wider range of parts at lower production volumes and in a shorter time frame means that a more efficient and streamlined approach is required. Andy Roberts, VP Software at Desktop Metal and the inventor of Live Parts™, presents the simulation software along with a number of case studies illustrating its capabilities

With the ability to eliminate tooling, dramatically reduce manufacturing timelines and create more complex parts than ever before, Binder Jetting (BJT) is quickly revolutionising the way many metal parts are produced. To reach its full potential, though, there is one hurdle that is often overlooked – sintering.
As with Metal Injection Moulding (MIM), BJT parts must be debound and then sintered at temperatures close to the melting point of the alloy being used. The sintering process can cause parts to shrink by as much as 20% and, if not properly supported, there is a real risk of parts slumping and sagging. The result is parts that may emerge from the sintering furnace cracked or deformed beyond usability. Even when not cracked, such parts are typically produced to tight tolerances and any requirement to correct the dimensional accuracy of the parts through post-processing creates additional overhead and expense.

Fig. 1 A Desktop Metal Production System installed at Indo-MIM’s metal Binder Jetting operation in San Antonio, Texas, USA (Courtesy Indo-MIM Inc)

For MIM suppliers, the low-tech solution has for decades been simply a mix of having an experienced eye for appropriate part design and basic trial-and-error: testing various combinations of part geometry, ceramic setters and rafts, then locking in the combination that works for mass production. However, what if, instead of fighting against sintering based deformation, we joined forces with it?

Fig. 2 This image shows three parts – the original CAD part (dark grey), a scan of the sintered straight part (purple), and the negative offset part generated by Live Sinter (light grey). The geometry of the sintered straight part matches the shape that Live Sinter produces after its sinter simulation (Courtesy Desktop Metal)

The need for a sintering simulation tool

A first-of-its-kind software application, Live Sinter is capable of simulating, in just minutes, the deformation parts undergo as they sinter, allowing manufacturers to predict how parts will change shape as they densify. Developed over a year in collaboration with Desktop Metal’s materials scientists, the software uses iterative simulation operations to create ‘negative offsets’ – proactively deforming parts by specific amounts in specific directions that allow them to achieve their intended shape as they sinter. Importantly, though, these negative offsets are not simply inversions of the deformation that parts experience during sintering. On the contrary, once the offsets are created, they represent an entirely new simulation challenge.

Fig. 2 shows three parts – the original CAD part (dark grey), a scan of the sintered straight part (purple), and the negative offset part gener- ated by Live Sinter (light grey). The geometry of the sintered straight part matches the shape that Live Sinter produces after its sinter simulation. The software uses the red vectors to derive green vectors that transform original points A to negative offset points C, thus forming the negative offset part. Importantly, the green negative offset vectors are not the negatives of the red vectors. Both the magnitudes and directions of the vectors are different. Live Sinter can generate the green negative offset vectors by using its sintering simula- tion engine. It is also noteworthy that, in performing a negative offset, Live Sinter not only transforms the geometry from points A to C, it also transforms the amount of material (metal powder) and the build orientations of cells. The negative offset process creates an entirely new physics problem that has its own sintering simulation results. The goal of these results is to produce a part represented by points C that sinters to the shape represented by points A.
The need for accurate, automatic, high-speed simulation tools such as Live Sinter is undeniable – in large part because a significant increase in part throughput is among the primary benefits that comes with Additive Manufacturing. If manufacturers hope to capitalise on the speed and agility of mass-production via AM, the rest of the manufacturing design process, as it ramps up to production, must be equally fast, and making sintering more predictable is a critical step.

Creating rafts and supports to hold parts during sintering is time- consuming, certainly, but the process is also expensive. In some cases, supports use more material than the parts themselves and, at scale, it can be the difference between a part that makes economic sense and one that does not. By predicting shrinkage and distortion during sintering, Live Sinter can reduce or fully eliminate the need for supports. The end result, despite sintering with minimal or even no rafts or supports, is parts that emerge from the furnace at near-net shape, reducing waste from failed builds and the time needed to post-process parts to meet specific tolerances.
While Live Sinter works across all Desktop Metal platforms, it is primarily targeted for use with the company’s Binder Jetting systems. Initially, Live Sinter will be available as a standalone application for download and local installation. In a future release, Desktop Metal may also offer a cloud-hosted version of the software.
Live Sinter may also be bundled with the sale of certain Desktop Metal Additive Manufacturing systems and will have features specifically tailored to Desktop Metal’s own technology and material offerings, but the technology is compatible with any sinterbased Powder Metallurgy process, including MIM.


Fig. 3 A screenshot of the Live Sinter software (Courtesy Desktop Metal)

Additive Manufacturing presents new sintering challenges

As the adoption of metal Additive Manufacturing, and, in particular, binder jet systems which deposit liquid binder onto metal powder to build parts layer-by-layer, has grown in recent years, so too has the demand for the sintering of metal powder parts. Whilst MIM and BJT parts share many similarities, including the requirement for debinding and sintering at near-melting point temperatures, in many ways the comparison between the two processes is limited to this step of the process. Creating a MIM part begins by creating a mould. Metal powder and binder are then mixed and injected into this mould to create what are referred to as ‘green’ parts, which go through a debinding process before being sintered in a furnace.

Additively manufacturing parts, by comparison, eliminates the need for moulds and other tooling or fixturing, allowing manu- facturers to quickly create parts, opening the door to highly-complex parts as well as mass customisa- tion from one build to the next.
While AM reduces part turnaround time and increases new part throughput, the lengthy trial-and- error process of finding a sintering solution becomes ever more impractical. To keep up, manufac- turers need simulation tools that can quickly predict how parts will behave in the furnace.
In addition, AM enables parts larger than those typically supported by MIM, meaning distor- tion during sintering can have a larger effect on their final shape. These factors and many others point to the need for a product like Live Sinter – a powerful simulation engine capable of modelling the complex physics at work as metal parts reach temperatures as high as 1,400°C.

Fig. 4 Without the negative offsets generated by Live Sinter, this drape bar test part shows a pronounced droop in the middle (top). To counteract the deformation, Live Sinter arches the top bar and tips the feet outward (middle) allowing the part to return to straight after sintering (bottom) (Courtesy Desktop Metal)

The challenge in modelling sintering behaviour

The notion of simulating how mate- rials respond to gravity, shrinkage, density variations, elastic bending, plastic deformation, friction drag and more is not a new idea, but it is an incredibly difficult one. Part of what makes sintering so difficult to model is the fact that it involves both thermodynamic and mechanical transformations that take place under intense heat, making them difficult to observe.
To monitor those changes, manufacturers have only two real options – either halting the sintering process mid-stream and examining parts after they cool, or installing windows in the furnace to observe distortions from images taken at high temperature.
With few other options, the goal has long been to find a way to simulate the process and, though attempts have been made to do just that, those models must replicate a host of factors, including material properties, density, stress, strain – both elastic and plastic, and friction contact, to name just a few.
Further complicating those efforts, simulating the process based on first principles means other factors such as the micro-behaviour of the material at the particle level, models of heat transfer, chemical reactions to heat and the mechanics involved in simulating the shrinkage and plastic deformation caused by factors like creep strain, must also enter the equation.
The difficulty of creating a model that incorporates all these factors means that, to date, most attempts to simulate sintering behaviour have come from academia and have relied on custom code. Ultimately, though, the vast complexity of the models, combined with a lack of data from inside hot furnaces, has made the process virtually impossible.

A novel, integrated approach to simulation

Live Sinter, however, takes an alter- native approach. Rather than working entirely from first principles, it uses a multi-physics engine borrowed from the gaming world which runs on NVIDIA GPUs – the same proces- sors found in high-end gaming PCs. Capable of modelling 700,000-plus particles with mass and radii, the multi-physics engine can simulate how particles collide with each other, as well as with the rigid bodies of arbitrary shapes. In addition, the engine models both body and direc- tional forces as they are applied to the particles.

The result is an extremely fast approximation – simulations are run in just minutes – of the physics inside the furnace, including shrinkage, plastic deformation, friction interaction and more. To refine the engine’s approximations, Live Sinter also employs a meshless FEA engine, which analyses the model at regular intervals to provide Von Mises stress based on data derived from the physics engine.

Complex physics, complex models

In order to simulate the complex behaviour of parts as they sinter, Live Sinter uses a number of approaches.
Simulation of the elastic behaviour of solid parts during sintering builds on a model developed by researchers at NVIDIA. By connecting a collection of simulated particles together with position constraints and dampers, Live Sinter can simulate behaviour such as stretching and compression, both of which are critical to under- standing how metal parts change shape during sintering.
At the same time, the software can model both static and dynamic friction, including the way in which the resulting reaction forces may change from part to part, either due to material differences or the presence of anti-sintering agents. By overlaying a model of plastic defor- mation on the elastic behaviour of the position constraints, Live Sinter can model how creep strain leads to non- uniform deformation of parts.
The system applies creep strain by relaxing the resting lengths of the position constraints over time, which indirectly changes the strain. In areas of higher stress and temperature, that change rate will be higher, leading to more deformation in some areas and less in others.

Fast simulation and excellent accuracy

Armed with its unique, dual-engine approach and highly complex models, Live Sinter can create a simulation of a furnace run in as little as three to seven minutes, as opposed to simulations using complex, dynamic physics which require hours to run. Based on that simulation, the software generates negative offsets in
fifteen to twenty minutes, something that other approaches to sintering simulation are unable to do.
The design of Live Sinter allows the system to strike a balance between speed and accuracy – the GPU-based physics engine provides a quick approximation of the sintering process, which can then be tuned to give more accurate results. The premise is that, while it may not be possible to know the coefficients for every property such as friction, compliance, grain size, diffusion rates or activation temperatures,
it may be possible to tune the physics engine to get the correct resulting shapes and produce successful parts.
To ensure the simulations are as accurate as possible, the first step in using Live Sinter is to tune the system using a series of test parts and scans of these parts after sintering. Once that tuning process is completee, an unlimited number of parts can be processed, simulating sintering distortion and producing negative offset geometry that results in straight sintered parts. Additionally, Live Sinter retains the high level of detail that makes metal AM an attractive manufacturing technology.

Fig. 5 Three images of a fibre heater body part. Live Sinter generates the CAD model (top) which is used to generate a green part (middle). As it sinters, the oval shape of the green part returns to its intended, circular shape (bottom). The images shown are not to scale. The slight warping in the flange is due to tiny density differences that occur during powder spreading. Algorithms to address those density changes are being developed for Live Sinter (Courtesy Desktop Metal)

Simulating macro and micro distortion effects

Generally speaking, the factors that affect how a part might behave during sintering fall into two main categories: macro factors, which cause distortion to the entire part, and micro factors, which might only occur in a small portion of the larger part. Importantly, Live Sinter compensates for both.
The bulk of the distortions compensated for by Live Sinter are related to macro factors, such as gravity and friction drag, which typically affect the entire part. In the case of the drape bar shown in Fig. 4, parts built without negative offsets showed a pronounced droop in the
middle. This is caused not primarily by gravity as one might guess, but rather the friction drag that prevents the bar’s feet from moving – the bottom portions remain fixed to the setter while the top regions are pulled together, causing a pivoting of the feet.
Were gravity and plastic distortion alone responsible for the distortion, the bar would not have this shape. The two outside feet would be planted flat. Instead, those feet are cocked inward far enough to lift the outside edges. Rather, the distortion is the result of the middle portion of the drape bar shrinking as it sinters. As that middle section
moves, however, the part’s feet remain immobile – friction drag prevents them from sliding inwards as far or as fast as the top of the bar, resulting in its characteristic distortion. While much of this distortion is caused by elastic bending during shrinkage, plastic creep strain takes over and causes the release of stress and freezing of the part in this final drooped shape.
The negative offsets created by Live Sinter instead arch the top of the bar up and tip the feet out, allowing the part to return to straight as it sinters. Because friction drag prevents the feet of the drape bar from sliding very much, the negative offset compensates for this by allowing the part to pivot around its largely immobile feet as it shrinks.
Interestingly, this places most of the part in compression as it sinters, rather than subjecting certain regions, such as the underside of the cross member, to tension, which would likely cause cracks.
For other parts, such as the heater body component shown in Fig. 5 from Desktop Metal’s Fiber™ machine, it became important to compensate for other issues. When built without negative offsets and minimal supports on the sides, the cylindrical part either warps or – in extreme cases – simply collapses on itself during sintering. Rather than build the part as a cylinder, the negative offset generated by Live Sinter creates an oval-shaped part. As it sinters, the combination of gravity and unsupported sides causes the oval shape to drop slightly, returning the part to its proper, circular shape.

In the case of the part known as a ULA bracket (Fig. 6), however, both of these factors – friction drag and gravity – are working at the same time to produce different effects in different regions of the part. When sintered without negative offsets, the feet of the bracket, as with the drape bar, tend to tip inward due to the shrinkage of the upper cross member combined with friction drag of the feet. At the same time, gravity, combined with an uneven weight distribution on the feet, causes the part to warp into a distinctive ‘duckfooted’ posture.

To compensate for these deformations, Live Sinter creates a part whose feet are tipped inward and arches the middle of the bracket, allowing the parts to return to straight during sintering. These macro effects, though, are just one type of feature that can lead to deformation of parts. The second is far more localised and stems from subtle differences in the density of the metal powder used in certain BJT processes.

Due to their symmetrical geometry, parts like the fuel swirler shown in Fig. 7 are far less susceptible to problems such as friction drag. If they do experience drag, their symmetrical shape means the entire part experiences it, so warping seen from looking down on the part is minimised. The pull of gravity also causes little, if any, changes during sintering.
However, when parts do exhibit problems, they may be related to density variations due to powder spreading or compaction in the powder bed.

Though this phenomenon is not completely understood, it is believed that changes in part density can occur as the powder spreading mechanism applies layers of metal powder over the build surface. Slight changes in density, built up through a part layer-by-layer, can cause a part to warp because areas of lower density shrink more than areas with higher density. In MIM, an equivalent scenario is when density variations arise as a result of powder/binder separation during the injection moulding process. Live Sinter, however, can compensate for these density variations and create negative offset designs that, when sintered, will result in straight parts.

Future outlook

Though it already shows great promise as a tool for making the sintering process more predictable, additional improvements to Live Sinter are planned for the future. One project, which will be undertaken in collaboration with Desktop Metal’s software engineers and material scientists, will add a layer of machine learning to identify correlations between changes to certain input parameters and changes in the deformation results in certain regions of a part. For example, if changing the friction coefficients for a part like the drape bar could lead to the part’s feet tilting in to a greater or lesser degree, a machine learning algorithm could spot the association, allowing the system to automatically tune these parameters to correct it.
A second project would add the ability for users to calibrate Live Sinter for even more precise results. Parts produced with negative offsets should emerge from sintering with straight geometry, but there may be cases where the geometry is not perfect, due to the software’s inability to accurately model some aspect of the shrinkage and deformation.

In these cases, users would be able to scan the finished part and identify areas that require fine tuning and the software would recalibrate the negative offsets to produce even more accurate results.

While the ultimate goal of Live Sinter is to eliminate deviations from specified part geometries that necessitate additional machining steps for BJT parts, the software today is unable to model sintering behaviour that emerges from different heat or gas flow patterns in furnaces or other complex thermodynamic transformations that take place in the furnace environment.
To address these issues, future versions of Live Sinter will include tools designed to allow users to scan finished parts, in which any number of parameters (related to different furnace runs, different production runs and more) were altered. The software can then automatically parts with usable results.

While Live Sinter is compatible with MIM parts, initially Desktop Metal will support materials offered on Desktop Metal AM systems and will continue to develop support for new materials in-house. In a future release, material optimisation capabilities will be made available externally, so customers can use Live Sinter to improve the accuracy of parts manufactured using their own novel materials.

Fig. 6 When built without negative offsets (top) this bracket tips inward and sags, while gravity and uneven weight distribution combine to produce a distinctive ‘duck-footed’ warping. To correct these issues, Live Sinter tips the feet inward and arches the middle of the bracket (middle), causing the part to return to its intended shape (bottom) as it sinters (Courtesy Desktop Metal)
Fig. 7 When sintered without using Live Sinter, tiny density variations in the metal powder cause the fins of this fuel swirler to warp in one direction or the other. Live Sinter compensates for those variations and produces a part that emerges from the furnace with straight fins (Courtesy Desktop Metal)

Answering a decades-old challenge

By making the sintering process more understandable and repeatable across multiple part designs, Live Sinter could offer benefits not just to individual manufacturers but to the Additive Manufacturing industry as a whole. For decades – even before the emergence of Binder Jetting technology – the Powder Metallurgy industry has struggled with questions of how to create supports that prop up parts in the furnace and, for decades, the answer has been to rely on the intuition of the relatively few engineers with years of hands-on sintering experience. With Live Sinter, however, the process becomes far more controllable – something that will likely help to assuage concerns of potential users.

For many companies, particularly those who have never used a furnace and have no experience with sintering, the notion of additively manufacturing and bulk sintering hundreds – or even dozens – of parts is a daunting one. While companies with MIM experience may have standard support structures they can turn to for Binder Jetting, many more are entering the process with limited exposure to Powder Metallurgy, so a product like Live Sinter is a critical tool that enables them to adopt metal Additive Manufacturing with confidence that they will be able to deploy the technology for mass production.
It has often been said that Additive Manufacturing will change the face of industry – Live Sinter is a crucial step in making it happen.


Andy Roberts
VP Software, Desktop Metal

From Pim International Magazine

Read More

PostProcess and Empire Group: A Superior Approach to SLA Resin Removal Drives Workflow Gains


As an early adopter of rapid prototyping and the first company in its region to embrace 3D printing,
service bureau Empire Group has been enabling clients with faster prototype delivery times and
increased productivity since 1999. Over the years, the company has expanded its offerings to include industrial design and engineering, rapid prototyping, rapid manufacturing, and graphic design, while continually priding themselves on artistry and craftsmanship. Understanding the nuances of each
material used within their shop, as well as the best finishing techniques, is critical to ensuring high product standards.

However, when it came to finishing Stereolithography (SLA) 3D printed parts, Empire Group faced bottlenecks that prohibited them from finishing parts as quickly as they wished. Though SLA 3D printing is acclaimed for its highly accurate part builds and cost-effectiveness, there is still a myriad of post-printing challenges that this technology produces.

In the case of Empire Group, resin removal with solvents and manual labor escalated into a more critical issue as the company grew. While the workload and number of printers increased, it was obvious that without an automated solution, the amount of time dedicated to post-printing would as well.

To keep their additive workflow moving smoothly, they implemented the automated PostProcess™ DEMI™ resin removal solution with proprietary SLA-formulated detergent. The DEMI utilizes agitation algorithms for software-controlled technology to swiftly remove excess resin, even in the narrowest of channels. This patent-pending technology, Submersed Vortex Cavitation (SVC), ensures consistency and prevents part damage while software controls the process.

Example SLA part


Developed specifically for additive manufacturing, PostProcess’s comprehensive solution delivered almost immediate benefits to Empire Group’s bottom line. The longevity of the PostProcess chemistry compared to the previously-used solvent (isopropyl alcohol) resulted in a quick positive ROI.

Empire Group has found the PostProcess DEMI to shine, especially when post-printing intricate parts or high-volume production of small parts. Now that they are able to handle resin removal in a fraction

of the time and spend less downtime on chemistry change-outs, the engineers and technicians at Empire Group can direct their energy on more value-added task such as quoting out orders, performing maintenance, build tray optimization, and more.

PostProcess’s software-driven solution has unlocked improvements across the board for Empire Group, on average reducing their SLA resin removal times by at least 50%, sometimes more.

Katie Marzocchi, Marketing Manager at Empire Group, said, “We’ve been in the additive realm for quite a while now, and in just a short time, the DEMI has optimized our workflow in the ways that matter most. From improving our bottom line and enabling scalability within our operation to reducing lead times and passing cost-savings on to our customers, the PostProcess solution is essential in helping us deliver high-quality products and service every time. We look forward to continuing our growth as a cutting-edge product development company, now with the DEMI in our tool belt.”

PostProcess™ DEMI™ Resin Removal Solution

About Empire Group
Empire Group is a full-service product development company located in Attleboro, Massachusetts. For over 20 years, we have been a trusted and dependable partner for our customers. Companies on the East Coast, and across the US, that are in the consumer goods, defense, medical device, aerospace/aviation, automotive, juvenile, and toy industries rely on us for our knowledge, experience, and wide range of services. For more information, visit

About PostProcess
PostProcess Technologies is the only provider of automated and intelligent post-printing solutions for 3D printed parts. Founded in 2014 and headquartered in Buffalo, NY, USA, with international operations in Sophia-Antipolis, France, PostProcess removes the bottleneck in the third step of 3D printing – post-printing – through patent-pending software, hardware, and chemistry technologies. The company’s solutions automate industrial 3D printing’s most common post-printing
processes with a software-based approach, including support, resin, and powder removal, as well as surface finishing,
resulting in “customer-ready” 3D printed parts. Additionally, as an innovator of software-based 3D post-printing,
PostProcess solutions will enable the full digitization of AM through the post-print step for the Industry 4.0 factory floor. The PostProcess portfolio has been proven across all major industrial 3D printing technologies and is in use daily in every imaginable manufacturing sector. For more information, visit


2495 Main St., Suite 615, Buffalo NY, 14214



Les Aqueducs B3, 535 Route des Lucioles, 06560 Sophia Antipolis, France

+33 (0)4 22 32 68 13

official website:

Read More

3D Printing Provides Innovation for Nearly Century Old Manufacturer

Article by: Peter Fretty Jul 15, 2020

As we have covered in recent months, COVID-19 played a pivotal role putting additive manufacturing on the map for manufacturers who otherwise had not taken its potential role seriously. For those willing to explore, additive has been enabled companies to speed up the prototyping process, enabled manufactures to build tooling without traditional delays. Of course, the true wins occur when the maturing technology enables meaningful innovations. And, true innovation often comes from the places you least expect.

Case in point: For more than 90 years, John Zink Hamworthy Combustion has operated on the outskirts of Tulsa, Oklahoma, building emissions control and clean air combustion systems, which production facilities around the world depend on to meet or exceed emissions standards. The company custom engineers burners, gas recovery and vapor control systems for a wide variety of energy, petrochemical and manufacturing customers.John Zink is a globally recognized leader in this space, but 21st century emissions problems require 21st century solutions. To help their customers meet rigorous environmental and efficiency standards, John Zink, a part of Koch Industries, recently invested in metal 3d printing technology from Desktop Metal to create parts that are engineered-to-order and optimized for each customer’s specific application.

“Engineers and designers are now able to create the designs they need to optimize each part’s function. In the past, tooling severely limited — and often strong-armed — design creativity. With 3D printing on our Studio System, designers can now transform their square peg/square hole mentality into free-form configurations and even complex geometries like fluted octagons,” Jonah Myerberg, CTO of Desktop Metal tells IndustryWeek. “This is a game changer for the industry as a whole, allowing companies like John Zink to produce custom, on-demand parts faster, cheaper and often times more optimal than with traditional means.”

After several months of working with the Desktop Metal Studio System, the world’s first office-friendly metal 3D printing system for rapid prototyping and low volume production, the companies today are sharing early results of the new additive manufacturing technology, which include:

  • Quick turnaround aftermarket replacement parts;
  • The ability to test different iterations of prototype designs faster;
  • Eliminating the need for casting tooling, saving both time and money because parts can now be printed in-house; and
  • Freedom of creating part designs that cannot be manufactured by traditional methods and can only be 3D printed.

“Our primary goal at John Zink is to custom engineer new systems that eliminate waste so our customers can operate safely and efficiently,” said Jason Harjo, design manager, John Zink. “Additive manufacturing rewrites the book on what is possible from a design standpoint, and working with Desktop Metal allows us a very low-cost entry point into the technology. The versatility of the Studio System has enabled our engineers and designers to find both applications for the technology as well as design and performance benefits we hadn’t even considered.”

Fuel Atomizer–Cost Savings 75%; Time Savings 37%

As a leader in developing innovative solutions to reduce emissions,John Zink has long understood that using atomizers to improve the fuel-air mix inside burners is one easy way to help customers minimize their environmental footprint. Using the Studio System, the company’s designers and engineers were able to prototype and test a variety of options before ultimately creating a radical new design featuring sweeping, airfoil-like fins. The geometric freedom of 3D printing even allowed them to reconsider the shape of the holes -instead of drilling round holes, the part is built with flat openings to improve atomization and increase burner efficiency. Where the previous design was able to reduce fuel use to 120 kilograms per hour, the new design cut fuel use to just 38 kilograms per hour. With three burners per ship, the environmental impact across an entire fleet can be huge. The savings can be equally significant -per ship, the new atomizer could save companies between $90,000 and $160,000 in fuel costs annually, and can be produced in few days for less than half the cost of a traditionally manufactured fuel atomizer.

Fuel Atomizer customizing designed and printed with Desktop Metal Studio System
Burner Tip customizing designed and printed with Desktop Metal Studio System

YE-6 Burner Tip–Cost Savings 72%

A key component in the efficient operation of industrial burners, burner tips are used to control the injection of fuel into the combustion chamber, or as atomizers, mixing fuel with an atomizing medium like steam to increase burner efficiency. The burner tip -originally cast and post-processed via CNC machining -was first manufactured 30 years ago, and the tooling used to produce it is no longer available. Because the part is too complex to machine as a single component, manufacturing spare parts using traditional techniques would require large investments in both time and money. Instead, John Zink engineers looked to 3D printing to produce a cost-effective replacement burner tip. Using the original engineering drawings, they modeled the burner tip and printed the part on the Studio System.The finished part was produced in just weeks -as opposed to months -and cost significantly less than a cast part -just a few hundred dollars versus a few thousand dollars.

Laser Gas Nozzle–Impossible Geometry for Traditional Manufacturing

A useful tool found in many machine shops, laser cutters can make precise cuts in a variety of materials.The challenge for John Zink engineers was the cutter’s nozzle could become clogged or slag could build up on the edges of cut parts, requiring labor-intensive post-processing. The solution they found was to use the Studio System to design and print an entirely new nozzle, one that incorporates a series of internal channels to direct high-pressure nitrogen gas across the cuts and blow away slag, preventing clogs and ensuring cleaner cuts. The complex geometry of the new nozzle could only be made using additive technology, and was printed in metal after an earlier version -printed from PLA plastic -melted at higher temperatures. Machine Tool Handles–When Plastic Just Won’t WorkAdditive technology has helped John Zink engineers recreate legacy parts and redesign existing parts, as well as helped them find creative solutions that improve how they manufacture those parts. Designed by a machinist with three decades of experience at John Zink, these handles were created to make it easier to lift and place heavy tools in a lathe, and were printed using the Studio System after the initial parts -printed in plastic -broke. The handles were printed rather than machined to minimize waste -each handle would have to be made from a relatively large piece of metal -and to leave machine shop capacity free for customer jobs.

Safety Shutoff Yoke and Handles–Less Down Time with Huge Savings

A key piece of safety equipment, this shutoff yoke and handles are installed on the USS Blue Ridge (LCC-19), which provides command, control, communications, computers, and intelligence support to the commander and staff of the United States Seventh Fleet. Because no tooling exists for this part, creating them via 3D printing was the most time-and cost-effective option for manufacturing. For customers, the payoff has come in less down time -printed parts can be in their hands and installed in days rather than weeks or months -and significant savings, both in part costs, and in fuel, thanks to innovative new designs that can only be manufactured via 3D printing.

“By eliminating the need for hard tooling with the Studio System,John Zink engineers have been able to produce innovative new parts, reproduce parts for which tooling no longer exists and find creative solutions to improving their workflow,” said Myerberg. “As a result, their team has been able to significantly speed up the design, manufacture and deployment of parts, while saving money and delivering parts faster to customers.”

According to Myerberg, as companies like John Zink look to expand their Additive Manufacturing capabilities, adopting additional technology like the Desktop Metal Shop System will help “broaden their portfolio, taking them from prototyping and aftermarket replacement parts to true mid-volume production runs of complex metal parts. Expanding their product portfolio will open up even more opportunities to provide the right solutions to their customers and further reduce costs.”

Please do read the official article here and you can also download the official E-Book by Desktop Metal here.

Read More

Lino3D will participate in Nanotexnology 2020, 4-11/7 in Thessaloniki

We are proud to announce you that Lino3D will participate in the upcoming Nanotexnology 2020 Conference in Thessaloniki.

We are expecting you in the official Nanotexnology 2020 exhibition from 6th to 10th of July. Come visit us at our booth and learn more about how Nanotexnology and 3D printing are two technologies inextricably linked.

Do not miss our Presentation on Nanotexnology 2020 Virtual Event on Wednesday, 8th of July.

Check the event’s program on

See you in Thessaloniki!

Read More